Use case · Content teams

The citation analysis shows which domains the engines link instead of you; the content gap shows which keywords to win; one click turns a gap into a brief your writers can execute.

See who gets quoted, and why

Across your tracked prompts' answers, the citation analysis aggregates the domains engines actually linked. The pattern is consistent: pages that directly answer the question get cited — comparison tables, definitions, step-by-step guides — not homepages.

Briefs in one click

Each content gap generates a complete brief: title starting point, H2 outline with talking points, entities and terms to cover, FAQ candidates and internal-link suggestions. Briefs are saved on the project and reusable — also over MCP, straight into your editor.

Published ≠ done

The keyword is already tracked, so the article's effect shows up in rankings and AI mentions on its own. Prompts keep asking the real questions; the mention and citation rates tell you whether the structure worked.

In the docs
Content Gap & Briefs
The write-it list and brief structure.
Citation analysis
Who gets cited instead of you.
Prompts
Track the questions buyers ask.

Give writers a brief, not a guess

Briefs cost 10 credits per generation by default — see the pricing page.

Start free →